“You are so picky when it comes
to food,” I told my younger son. “And a
lot of your food likes and dislikes seem arbitrary.”
“What do you mean?” Elliot asked, a little defensively.
“Well, you like cupcakes, but
won’t eat muffins,” I said.
“That’s because cupcakes are
better than muffins,” he said.
“It should depend on the
ingredients,” I said. “But once you make
a statement like that, you can’t really argue about it. Another example is that you won’t eat
pancakes unless they have blueberries in them.
Plain pancakes need not apply.
But waffles are OK.”
“Pancakes without blueberries
are just gross,” Elliot said.
“They’d probably taste better
if you put some syrup on them,” I suggested.
“Why would I do that? I don’t like syrup,” he countered.
Checkmated at last, I fell
silent. Apparently, my son’s dietary idiosyncrasies
were completely reasonable.
Now, I am as aware as anyone
that the old Roman proverb, “de gustibus non est disputandum” applies in these
sorts of situations. That is to say,
there is no arguing over taste. The fact
that I don’t like the taste and texture if eggs is a fact of life and no amount
of debate will convince me otherwise.
That said, I am convinced that
many of my son’s dietary decisions have more to do with weird mental blocks he
has with certain foods rather than with actual taste.
I am afraid that many times we
are locked into poor paths, not because of actual restrictions, but because of
things we just don’t want to do. The sad
thing is that we often miss out on much that is beautiful because we aren’t
willing to make the effort to break out of the pattern set before us by our
rigid thinking.
A life well lived is one in
which people are willing to try things outside the box of their
expectations. For, the man who chooses
not to eat muffins, simply because they aren’t cupcakes will miss out on an
awful lot of breakfast goodness.

No comments:
Post a Comment